|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
09-16-2004, 12:09 PM | #76 |
USER INFO »
Status: Tree of Wisdom
Posts: 8,025
Joined: Sep 2002
Currently: Offline
|
LOL! LOL! LOL!
The thing is: ~Stapp should have paid back. 60K for him is like shit to me... ~If the doctor is wrong, then fine... sue him! it's another issue, another lawsuit. ~Now if he didn't pay Jeff coz he's waiting for another process against the doc for mispractices, he still should've paid Jeff back... or at least commit the ammount for custody until it's settled... It doesn't matter the reason, it still makes Stapp looks bad.
__________________
.:: "If people don't like guitar solos... then they're frikkin' stupid!" - Mark Tremonti ::. |
09-16-2004, 12:52 PM | #77 |
USER INFO »
Status: Broken Dream
Posts: 173
Joined: Jun 2004
Currently: Offline
|
Keep in mind he is accused of not paying back a loan doesn't mean he didn't. In America innocent until proven guilty. He may owe the money and he may not. In America anyone can sue for anything at anytime. To me it does not make Stapp look bad until the case goes to trial and Stapp pleas his case and the judge and jury makes a ruling. We all should stop making judgement until the case is heard. Remember the other case that he was sued for a bad concert in Chicago the judge dismiss the case. The same can be said in this case. I wouldn't be surprise if Stapp gets sued all the time it's part of life. |
09-16-2004, 12:59 PM | #78 |
USER INFO »
Status: Tree of Wisdom
Posts: 8,025
Joined: Sep 2002
Currently: Offline
|
err... that's different... the other process was a joke.
__________________
.:: "If people don't like guitar solos... then they're frikkin' stupid!" - Mark Tremonti ::. |
09-16-2004, 02:29 PM | #79 |
USER INFO »
Status: Broken Dream
Posts: 173
Joined: Jun 2004
Currently: Offline
|
I agree the other process was a joke and it could be the same in this case as well. We just don't know I don't think Stapp is losing sleep over it we just don't know all the details we just have to wait until the due process. I have really come to the conclusion in Stapp's case anything he does or anything that goes wrong in his life will be looked at in a negative light by some. It's really sad but that is the truth. |
09-16-2004, 11:17 PM | #80 |
Banned
USER INFO »
Posts: 328
Joined: Mar 2003
Currently: Offline
|
The point of the case is that Mr. Cameron paid some money for "treatment" Stapp received, and now he wants it back Nowhere does it state that Mr. Stapp requested the treatment, however. If I was pressured into accepting treatment that I didn't request, so that the "show might go on" as they would say, I might have a bit of a problem seeing where it is my responsibility to pay for it. Yeah....yeah...its Cameron suing and not Hanson management. I prefer to wait and see what a jury decides. And believe me, my ability to "discern" things is perfectly fine. Your keen interest in this matter and your ability to apparently just "know" what transpired between these two people is uncanny. I'm sure Jeff Cameron is honored to know that there are others out there spending so much of their time defending his honor and working to make sure he gets is bucks back. |
09-17-2004, 07:28 AM | #81 |
USER INFO »
Status: Silence Speaks
Posts: 54
Joined: Aug 2003
Currently: Offline
|
Check out the court docs. It's all right there. I'm just reading the black and white. Items #6 and #7:
6 At the time Plaintiff made these payments, Defendant promised to reimburse Plaintiff for the full cost of the medical treatments. 7. Thereafter Plaintiff demanded reimbursement of the $60,000.00, but Defendant has refused to make such reimbursement to Plaintiff. Come back down to earth Jooji. We're just talking about this thing...I couldn't affect this lawsuit even I wanted to. And Mr. Cameron's honor doesn't even need defending. Again...I'm just reading the black and white. |
09-17-2004, 12:13 PM | #82 |
USER INFO »
Status: Tree of Wisdom
Posts: 8,025
Joined: Sep 2002
Currently: Offline
|
just to add something: Mr Cameron was pretty naive as well...
If the goal was to preserve Stapp identity on the bill, JHMP should've paid, the business, and not a person.
__________________
.:: "If people don't like guitar solos... then they're frikkin' stupid!" - Mark Tremonti ::. |
09-17-2004, 12:14 PM | #83 |
Forum Diplomat
USER INFO »
Status: Saving Grace
Posts: 12,439
Joined: Sep 2002
Currently: Offline
|
Oh my God, how much longer can this topic live?
__________________
MK: We're never gonna have the Super Bowl of Scott Stapp vs. Myles Kennedy in a sing-off - it's ridiculous. SP: Actually, we are setting that up. MT: It was in your contract when you signed up with us. |
09-17-2004, 06:32 PM | #84 |
USER INFO »
Status: Silence Speaks
Posts: 54
Joined: Aug 2003
Currently: Offline
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|