|
View Poll Results: Which of these three has your vote? | |||
George W. Bush/Dick Cheney (GOP) | 14 | 60.87% | |
John Kerry/John Edwards (Dem) | 6 | 26.09% | |
Ralph Nader/Peter Camejo (Green) | 1 | 4.35% | |
no one/I'm not voting | 2 | 8.70% | |
Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
10-08-2004, 06:43 PM | #46 |
USER INFO »
Status: Faceless Fan
Posts: 500
Joined: Sep 2004
Currently: Offline
|
They i really didn't mean to put that in there but if you call youself a true conservative you would disagree with bush on how much he has spent. You still haven't answered my responses. |
10-08-2004, 08:37 PM | #47 |
USER INFO »
Status: Misconception
Posts: 89
Joined: Mar 2004
Currently: Offline
|
not to bea bitch to any kerry/edwards fans, but i think we need bushg back in office! kerry is an absolute moron! he is an american gigilo and it seems like he'll marry any rich woman to boost his career! once again, no offence!
__________________
I believe, if life gives you lemons that you should make lemonade... then find sumone who's life gives them vodka and have a party! Ron White |
10-08-2004, 08:51 PM | #48 |
USER INFO »
Status: Blue Collar
Posts: 650
Joined: Sep 2004
Currently: Offline
|
Man, I support Bush, and i see that as offensive. We're trying to keep it legitamte here, lol.
By the way, guys, the reason why I haven't posted here much is cuz y'all are ripping the words right out of my mouth, so....
__________________
-Amber "A person should not believe in an "-ism," he should believe in himself." -Ferris Bueller |
10-08-2004, 11:31 PM | #49 |
Forum Diplomat
USER INFO »
Status: Rising Sun
Posts: 4,161
Joined: Sep 2002
Currently: Offline
|
As a fine lady once told me; "...because apperently you can eat anything with ketchup!" [to go along with COlin's "everyone likes a little Bush" comment]
As for DWBF, I've read your previous posts, so I am going to assume you were tired or had something else on your mind... so I hate to ask, but can you rewrite what you wrote? Thanks.
__________________
Intellectial Giant (Social Outcast) |
10-09-2004, 03:46 AM | #50 |
USER INFO »
Status: Faceless Fan
Posts: 500
Joined: Sep 2004
Currently: Offline
|
I don't understand this....... Yes, key word being defend. It is our obligation to defend our allies. But unlike Iraq, first strike has been passed down to those other countries. Put it in other words please. |
10-09-2004, 10:04 AM | #51 |
Forum Diplomat
USER INFO »
Status: Rising Sun
Posts: 4,161
Joined: Sep 2002
Currently: Offline
|
You said it was our obligation to defen out allies, which it is, it is our obligation to defen our allies. But when push comes to shove and military force is needed in North Korea -- first strike [ones that make the first move] has ben given to South Korea, Russia, China, and Japan. Once conflict has started, our role in it will depend in when and where THEY call is in. So in simpler words, it is thier job to push the "little red button" before we do. Sounds biased but international treaties have made it so.
__________________
Intellectial Giant (Social Outcast) |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|