View Single Post
Old 09-16-2004, 12:52 PM   #77
musiclover291
USER INFO »
Status: Broken Dream
Posts: 173
Joined: Jun 2004
Currently: Offline
Quote: (Originally Posted by Bridge of Clay) LOL! LOL! LOL!

The thing is:

~Stapp should have paid back. 60K for him is like shit to me...

~If the doctor is wrong, then fine... sue him! it's another issue, another lawsuit.

~Now if he didn't pay Jeff coz he's waiting for another process against the doc for mispractices, he still should've paid Jeff back... or at least commit the ammount for custody until it's settled...

It doesn't matter the reason, it still makes Stapp looks bad.

Keep in mind he is accused of not paying back a loan doesn't mean he didn't. In America innocent until proven guilty. He may owe the money and he may not. In America anyone can sue for anything at anytime. To me it does not make Stapp look bad until the case goes to trial and Stapp pleas his case and the judge and jury makes a ruling. We all should stop making judgement until the case is heard. Remember the other case that he was sued for a bad concert in Chicago the judge dismiss the case. The same can be said in this case. I wouldn't be surprise if Stapp gets sued all the time it's part of life.
Reply With Quote