View Single Post
Old 06-18-2005, 06:14 AM   #4
Lunar Shadow
Lunar Shadow's Avatar
USER INFO »
Status: Wound Up
Posts: 1,244
Joined: Jun 2005
Currently: Offline
Quote: (Originally Posted by no_fixd_address) http://www.carl-olson.com/articles/atheism_envoy.html
This article is full of fallacies: ad hominem fallacy, appeal to faith:
Quote: Why the Burden of Proof is on the Atheist
http://origins.org/articles/mcinerny_burdenofproof.html
Here is my question after reading the article.... why should a skeptic have the burden of proof when "god/s" hasn't even proven with reasonable doubt that he/they exist/s? Or for that matter that theists have yet to give a reasonable argument that "god/s" exist/s. if this is your life long crusade where is the evidence? personally I don't give a damn if people believe that god/s exist/s let them no skin off my back but in the world of science it is so that if you are trying to prove something the burden of proof is on you no on the skeptic.

Quote: PASTORAL CONSTITUTION ON THE CHURCH IN THE MODERN WORLD
GAUDIUM ET SPES
CHAPTER I THE DIGNITY OF THE HUMAN PERSON
15, 19, 20, 21, 22
http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_c...t-spes_en.html
yet more fallacies: ad hominem, confirmation bias, appeal to faith, argument from authority


I mean the list goes on and on here shall I continue?
__________________
Lunar Shadow

Last edited by Lunar Shadow : 06-18-2005 at 06:23 AM.
Reply With Quote